0.03/0.11 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 960 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 120 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Aug 9 04:45:59 EDT 2022 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : 0.18/0.45 Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving 0.18/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 0.18/0.46 # Version: 3.0pre003-ho 0.18/0.46 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA. 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.18/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.46 # Starting new_bool_9 with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho2 with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.46 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.46 # Starting full_lambda_10 with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.46 # Starting new_ho_8 with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.46 # full_lambda_10 with pid 16990 completed with status 0 0.18/0.46 # Result found by full_lambda_10 0.18/0.46 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA. 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.18/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.46 # Starting new_bool_9 with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho2 with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.46 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.46 # Starting full_lambda_10 with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,5,20000,3.0,true) 0.18/0.46 # ...ProofStateSinE()=6/15 0.18/0.46 # Search class: HGUSF-FFSF11-SSSFFSBN 0.18/0.46 # partial match(1): HGUSF-FFSF21-SSSFFSBN 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total) 0.18/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 65s (1) cores 0.18/0.46 # post_as_ho12 with pid 16996 completed with status 0 0.18/0.46 # Result found by post_as_ho12 0.18/0.46 # Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA. 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total) 0.18/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.46 # Starting new_bool_9 with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho4 with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho2 with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.46 # Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.46 # Starting full_lambda_10 with 120s (1) cores 0.18/0.46 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,5,20000,3.0,true) 0.18/0.46 # ...ProofStateSinE()=6/15 0.18/0.46 # Search class: HGUSF-FFSF11-SSSFFSBN 0.18/0.46 # partial match(1): HGUSF-FFSF21-SSSFFSBN 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total) 0.18/0.46 # Starting post_as_ho12 with 65s (1) cores 0.18/0.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.18/0.47 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.18/0.47 0.18/0.47 # Proof found! 0.18/0.47 # SZS status Theorem 0.18/0.47 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_22, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_23, type, lChris_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_24, type, lCorina_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_25, type, lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_26, type, n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_27, type, wife_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_28, type, husband_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_29, type, inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI: ($i > $i > $o) > ($i > $i > $o) > $o). 0.18/0.47 thf(decl_30, type, esk1_0: $i). 0.18/0.47 thf(con, conjecture, ?[X1:$i > $i > $o]:(((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((X1 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i)))&~(((X1)=(^[X2:$i, X3:$i]:(($true))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', con)). 0.18/0.47 thf(ax3, axiom, ![X8:$i]:((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X8 @ (($true)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax3)). 0.18/0.47 thf(ax5, axiom, (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax5)). 0.18/0.47 thf(ax4, axiom, ?[X2:$i]:(~((husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ X2))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax4)). 0.18/0.47 thf(ax2, axiom, ![X4:$i > $i > $o, X5:$i > $i > $o]:(((inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X5 @ X4)=>![X6:$i, X7:$i]:(((X5 @ X6 @ X7)<=>(X4 @ X7 @ X6))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax2)). 0.18/0.47 thf(ax1, axiom, (inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ wife_THFTYPE_IiioI), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax1)). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X1:$i > $i > $o]:((((~(X1 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&((X1 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)))&((X1)!=(^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i]:(($true))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con])])])])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X16:$i > $i > $o]:((((~(X16 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i)|(X16 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i)|((X16)=(^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i]:(($true)))))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)|(X16 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i)|((X16)=(^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i]:(($true))))))&((~(X16 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true)|((X16)=(^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i]:(($true)))))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true)|((X16)=(^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i]:(($true)))))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X17:$i]:((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X17 @ (($true)))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax3])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i > $i > $o]:((((X1)=(^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i]:(($true))))|~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true))))|~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (($true)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X2:$i]:((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ X2 @ (($true)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i > $i > $o]:((((X1)=(^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i]:(($true))))|~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10])])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i > $i > $o]:((((X1)=(^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i]:(($true))))|~((X1 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i))|~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (($true)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_13, axiom, ((~(wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&((wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax5])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i > $i > $o, X2:$i, X3:$i]:(((X1 @ X2 @ X3)|~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))))), inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i > $i > $o]:((((X1)=(^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i]:(($true))))|~((X1 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_10])])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_16, plain, ((wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))), inference(primitive_enumeration,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_18, plain, ?[X2:$i]:(~(husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ X2)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[ax4])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_19, plain, ![X19:$i > $i > $o, X20:$i > $i > $o, X21:$i, X22:$i]:(((~(X20 @ X21 @ X22)|(X19 @ X22 @ X21)|~(inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X20 @ X19))&(~(X19 @ X22 @ X21)|(X20 @ X21 @ X22)|~(inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X20 @ X19)))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2])])])])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$i, X2:$i, X1:$i > $i > $o]:(((X1 @ X2 @ X3)|~((X1 @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i)))), inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_21, plain, (wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lCorina_THFTYPE_i @ lChris_THFTYPE_i), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_22, plain, ~(husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ esk1_0), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_23, plain, ![X2:$i, X4:$i > $i > $o, X3:$i, X1:$i > $i > $o]:(((X4 @ X3 @ X2)|~((X1 @ X2 @ X3))|~((inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ X4 @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_24, plain, (inverse_THFTYPE_IIiioIIiioIoI @ husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ wife_THFTYPE_IiioI), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i, X3:$i]:((wife_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X2 @ X3)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_21])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_26, plain, ~((husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lChris_THFTYPE_i @ esk1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_27, plain, ![X2:$i, X3:$i]:((husband_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X2 @ X3)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23, c_0_24]), c_0_25])])). 0.18/0.47 thf(c_0_28, plain, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26, c_0_27])]), ['proof']). 0.18/0.47 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.18/0.47 # Parsed axioms : 15 0.18/0.47 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 9 0.18/0.47 # Initial clauses : 11 0.18/0.47 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1 0.18/0.47 # Initial clauses in saturation : 10 0.18/0.47 # Processed clauses : 33 0.18/0.47 # ...of these trivial : 1 0.18/0.47 # ...subsumed : 4 0.18/0.47 # ...remaining for further processing : 28 0.18/0.47 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 0.18/0.47 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.18/0.47 # Backward-subsumed : 3 0.18/0.47 # Backward-rewritten : 3 0.18/0.47 # Generated clauses : 43 0.18/0.47 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 27 0.18/0.47 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.18/0.47 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.18/0.47 # Paramodulations : 11 0.18/0.47 # Factorizations : 0 0.18/0.47 # NegExts : 0 0.18/0.47 # Equation resolutions : 2 0.18/0.47 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.18/0.47 # Propositional check models : 0 0.18/0.47 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.18/0.47 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.18/0.47 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.18/0.47 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.18/0.47 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.18/0.47 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.18/0.47 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.18/0.47 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.18/0.47 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.18/0.47 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.18/0.47 # Current number of processed clauses : 13 0.18/0.47 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4 0.18/0.47 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 0.18/0.47 # Negative unit clauses : 1 0.18/0.47 # Non-unit-clauses : 8 0.18/0.47 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 11 0.18/0.47 # ...number of literals in the above : 25 0.18/0.47 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.18/0.47 # Current number of archived clauses : 15 0.18/0.47 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 13 0.18/0.47 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11 0.18/0.47 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1 0.18/0.47 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11 0.18/0.47 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.18/0.47 # BW rewrite match attempts : 5 0.18/0.47 # BW rewrite match successes : 3 0.18/0.47 # Condensation attempts : 0 0.18/0.47 # Condensation successes : 0 0.18/0.47 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1860 0.18/0.47 0.18/0.47 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.18/0.47 # User time : 0.006 s 0.18/0.47 # System time : 0.001 s 0.18/0.47 # Total time : 0.007 s 0.18/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 1752 pages 0.18/0.47 0.18/0.47 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.18/0.47 # User time : 0.006 s 0.18/0.47 # System time : 0.004 s 0.18/0.47 # Total time : 0.011 s 0.18/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 1728 pages 0.18/0.47 EOF